Last week environmental organizations put out a proposal for a "Better Future Fund" aimed at the next BC election coming in May. It proposed to take the provincial carbon tax and apply revenues to various initiatives to green up our energy expenditures. The biggest chunk they earmarked for transit while proposing other investments in energy efficiencies for buildings and local community initiatives aimed at reducing our carbon footprint.
The community piece was pretty light on details, and the fund proposal missed the mark on active transportation - nothing in there about cycling and walking which, in many BC communities, are rapidly growing as viable transportation choices for more and more of our citizens and, unlike some of the other proposals, have a much more immediate and direct benefit in individual and community health.
I put out a news release to point out the missing link here, unfortunately all too typical of those who can't see the trees for the forest. They get the big picture but don't always grasp some of the details of how to get there. The Better Future Fund is still well intended and a good start to an important discussion, but we need to make sure that the practical solutions that we need to help people make more sustainable choices are spelled out in some detail and appropriately funded so that the sticks of the carbon tax are better paired with the carrots of real options for more sustainable lifestyle choices in how and where we live, and in the transportation choices we will be making several times a day, every day.
Capital Bike and Walk Society
johnluton@shaw.ca
250-592-4753
250-886-4166 (cell)
The community piece was pretty light on details, and the fund proposal missed the mark on active transportation - nothing in there about cycling and walking which, in many BC communities, are rapidly growing as viable transportation choices for more and more of our citizens and, unlike some of the other proposals, have a much more immediate and direct benefit in individual and community health.
I put out a news release to point out the missing link here, unfortunately all too typical of those who can't see the trees for the forest. They get the big picture but don't always grasp some of the details of how to get there. The Better Future Fund is still well intended and a good start to an important discussion, but we need to make sure that the practical solutions that we need to help people make more sustainable choices are spelled out in some detail and appropriately funded so that the sticks of the carbon tax are better paired with the carrots of real options for more sustainable lifestyle choices in how and where we live, and in the transportation choices we will be making several times a day, every day.
March
12, 2013
For
Immediate Release
Better
Future Fund Incomplete Says Cycling advocate
The
Better Future Fund proposed by leading environmental organizations is a good
recipe for BC’s carbon tax, but it is missing some essential ingredients, says Capital
Bike and Walk Executive Director John Luton.
“Dollar
for dollar, investments in cycling infrastructure is one of the most efficient
and effective means of shifting travel choices to sustainable modes”, he
said.
“Carbon
taxes need to be paired with investments in cycling infrastructure to help
people choose cycling for more of their daily travel needs”, says Luton, “and
the Better Future plan is a missed opportunity to make that point. When it
comes to transportation, there is more than one shade of green”.
Victoria
already has the highest mode share for cycling of any city in Canada, and can
do more, but cities need helping funding the capital projects that are needed
to attract a broader demographic than we’ve been able to grow so far. Cycling is
not only a viable choice on its own, but, in larger cities, it also partners
well with the transit that Better Future supporters want to fund, and has a
coincident benefit in individual and community health.
Capital
Bike and Walk has been working with local advocates and others in the province
through the BC Cycling Coalition to develop a vision of what the province could
achieve with new investments in cycling infrastructure. He says the plan would not only help shift
travel choices to more sustainable modes but would also help BC better compete
with other jurisdictions putting money into cycling tourism initiatives that
are growing jobs and new, sustainable economic modelsy.
Quebec
is growing thousands of jobs around their “Route Verte” project; Vermont’s
cycling tourism industry is bigger than maple syrup and locally, businesses and
many BC communities are already building their own strategies to attract green
tourism.
“Moving
BC forwards to a more sustainable model needs to pair more of the carrots with
the stick of the carbon tax. We can’t
just punish people with new costs – we’ve got to give them a range of options
that will help them make the transition now and in the future. We need the transit plan, but it has a much
longer gestation period and higher up front capital costs than does cycling
infrastructure programs”, said Luton.
“Provincial
investments in cycling have been working, but programs have too often been cut
to meet fiscal pressures. We need to tie
carbon taxes to program spending that makes good policy sense, and putting
money into cycling is essential to a better future for BC.”
For
more information:
John
Luton, Executive DirectorCapital Bike and Walk Society
johnluton@shaw.ca
250-592-4753
250-886-4166 (cell)
BC
Cycling Coalition provincial recommendations at:
http://bccc.bc.ca/take-action/